Here’s what has been and continues to be happening: Obama signs executive orders that bypass Congress to implement policy that he could never get through Congress. Then they end up getting challenged in court, but usually much later, after the damage is done. Even then, the process is likely to take years to resolve and in the mean time a large number of people end up in legal limbo. The only way to fight this is by fighting fire with fire, or in other words, executive order with executive order. Obama is over the line, exploiting a loophole that should never have existed. Kudos to Governor Brewer for her recognition of this problem and courageous solution. How many states will follow suit? I think we’re about to see a civil war waged by executive orders and in the courts.
On September 11th, 2012, mobs attacked the American Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, and also the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, killing one American, all, supposedly because of some movie that was insulting to Islam. Really? That isn’t the insult I hear. The insult I hear is to our intelligence. Are we supposed to believe that some no-name movie, so obscure that even the people attributing the violence to it can’t name it, just happened to incite crowds in countries now under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood to attack American diplomatic missions on the anniversary of the 911 attacks?
No, it wasn’t pious believers being offended by some movie that virtually none of them have ever seen. It was barbarians celebrating the attacks on America that occurred 11 years ago. What if Americans took a page from the barbarians’ play book and attacked the embassies of those countries that contributed men and materials to the 911 attacks, or contributed resources protecting, supplying or training Al Caida? That would make a hell of a lot more sense. So why don’t we? Because we are NOT, by and large, barbarians.
Add to it the first reaction of the Obama administration’s State Department: apology for offending the radical islamists, the Salafiyyah, who are stirring up trouble all over the place including Morocco, Egypt, Libya, India, Germany, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Albania, Afghanistan, Malaysia, Algeria and pretty much every place where there are non-fundamentalist Muslims or non-Muslims unwilling to be subjugated. It is difficult to distinguish between Al Caida and the Salafists in general (or Wahabbists, for that matter), so in essence, Obama apologized to Al Caida for offending their radical ideology. And, yeah, I know how they spell it; I just spell it according to the rules of the English language and will continue to do so as long as I am an English speaker. Too bad if that bothers anybody.
So much for the Arab Spring in Egypt and Libya. Obama’s clumsy foreign policy is now looking alarmingly like Carter’s equally inept handling of the conflict in Iran that led to the overthrow of the Shah and the seizure of the US Embassy in Tehran along with 66 American hostages. While there is certainly an argument to be made that Carter is not to blame for the destabilization of Iran (things had gone pretty far down that road before he even took office), there really isn’t much good to be said about how he handled the parts of it that ultimately occurred on his watch. Don’t be surprised if tensions and incidents escalate. Some Ayatollah-wannabee just might have ambitions in that direction. I wouldn’t want to be in Egypt, Libya or any of those other areas where Salafists have substantial influence if Obama wins the election. Anybody caught up in that could be looking at being a hostage for a lot longer than 444 days. Or worse.
Update: The American Ambassador to Libya has been killed along with three more staffers – making the total number of Americans killed in Libya five – in a rocket attack while he was attempting to help them to safety. The details are still a bit vague, but it sounds like he was being a hero when he could have just gotten himself out of danger with relative ease.
We are all familiar with Barack Obama’s Teleprompter dependency, even though he still stumbles and stammers his way through a speech even with the assistance of one. This affliction appears to be epidemic among the delegates to the Democratic National Convention. Did they catch it from Barack? Or did he catch it from them? We will probably never know. And then, of course, there’s Joe Biden.
The DNC, in a desperation move after their platform was hijacked by radicals, imposed the will of the empty chair and re-included language, over the stiff opposition of many of the delegates, supporting Israel and Jerusalem as its capital. Of course, a two-thirds majority was required for such a change, but even though it did not exist, the changes were ‘approved’ anyway.
What do we know from this? We know that the DNC is chock-full of, and the platform was written by, radicals. We know that there is a very strong anti-Israel constituency in the Democratic Party. We know that rules don’t matter, not even their own rules, when a high-ranking player is involved. We know that if they see a negative reaction they will flip-flop – at least until the election is over.
“Just because you do not take an interest in politics does not mean that politics won’t take an interest in you” – Pericles
“First they came for the Jews, and I said nothing…”
We have had the privilege, the luxury, of being able to ignore politics and still have no real worries. We have had the luxury of being able to say “I’m not political.” We have said “your relentless political postings have changed my political views. NOT!” because politics is a distasteful business full of crooks and liars and dirty money.
People have deliberately distracted you with shiny baubles while they stole your country. They deliberately tuned you out of the political process by making it sordid and unseemly, by being divisive and accusatory. This is deliberate. In order for them to take what you have they have to make you look away in disgust, or at something else in anger.
Politics does not have to be deception. You can make a difference. Pay attention to the issues. Not the made up fake issues, but the real issues. It’s about your children and grandchildren and the kind of country, society and legacy you will give them. Pay attention not only to what the politician promises you today, but what that means for tomorrow. Pay attention.
For the beginning to intermediate electronics hobbyist or journeyman fix-it guy this is an excellent resource. It could be used as a textbook. Highly organized, well presented and comprehensive. It addresses everything from the bottom up; tools you’ll need, how to use them, safety issues, troubleshooting techniques, component identification, signal tracing, mechanical considerations and more. Lots of red meat in this book. Worth reading and keeping.
Pathological liar and disgraced pseudo-journalist David Corn is perpetuating yet another lie about Mitt Romney, to wit, that he invested, via BAIN Capital, in a medical waste disposal company that disposed of aborted human beings.
Naturally, other left-wing useful idiots are picking up on this without any fact checking, and relabeling the ‘medical waste disposal business’ as the ‘abortion business’.
The gist of the claims is that Romney was still at BAIN when the Stericycle deal happened, Stericycle deals in aborted human beings, and that makes Mitt Romney an abortion facilitating hypocrite.
The simple truth is this: Not only did Stericycle not begin dealing with aborted human beings until after Romney had left BAIN, Stericycle did not begin disposing of aborted human bengs untill after BAIN had completely divested from it.
Having been an executive in a business, I can say that the venture capitalists that invested in that business not only didn’t get involved in the day to days, they didn’t dictate clients, either. The claim that while Romney was organizing and running the Olympics he somehow managed to find the time to secretly run dozens of other companies is ludicrous. But even if you believe that he was somehow able to do so, BAIN’s, and therefore Romney’s, involvement with Stericycle ended at least one year before Stericycle became involved with abortion clinics as clients.
As for Stericycle, the idea that they should be punished for disposing of aborted babies is kind of putting the cart before the horse. They didn’t invent abortion and somebody has to dispose of the so-called waste. Would I invest in a company that did it, though? No. And Mitt Romney didn’t invest in that kind of company, either.
Oh, and if Mitt Romney can organize and run a successful Olympics while secretly running a bunch of other companies profitably, maybe he is *exactly* the guy we need in the White House.
You might have seen this new video MoveOn.org published recently. As is the norm for them, it is difficult to find anything in their publications that even remotely resembles the truth. The best they can do is project their own strategies onto the Republicans or quote people out of context. There is so much wrong with this video, it is difficult to know where to start. I must say that I am in one fashion impressed with the video, though. The amount of falsehoods, misrepresentations and out of context quotes packed into a mere 4 minutes is downright Orwellian.
But, since a friend of the liberal persuasion asked me, no, challenged me, to do just that, I’ll start with a point by point rundown of the claims made in the MoveOn.org video. I’m sure that I’ll miss some, but no doubt someone will point out my oversights.
The first thing I will address is the comment regarding Romney’s background: “Did anybody even vet this guy?”
WHAT?!?! LOL! From Obama backers? I couldn’t stop laughing at that one for a while. Are these people even aware that Obama has released virtually none of his records and of the few he has released, most of them have been declared forgeries by qualified document forensic analysts? Of those that have not been demonstrated to be fakes, most of them are contradicted by each other or by documents the Obama machine could not completely eradicate, like his book blurb. Even the pictures put forth by the Obama machine have been discredited, like the one where his mother has a black hand, or the one where Obama is wearing a wedding ring in 1983 (he married Michelle in 1992, nine years later). All those documents and pictures do is lend support to the claims that his birth certificate is a forgery.
Romney, on the other hand, has published many of his personal documents. That is why the Obama machine is targeting the tax returns. They don’t have anything else to go after that might be useful. Obama has never had a particularly complicated financial situation. It’s certain to be easy for the Obama machine to pick some specific point and present it out of context with the complexity Romney’s tax records are likely to present. And, of course, since nobody has legal access to Romney’s tax records, it’s easy for Reid and Pelosi, as surrogates of the Obama campaign, to insinuate or outright declare anything they want to regarding them. Of course, Reid has not released his own income tax returns.
Next up is the “corporations are people” out-of-context quote. When Romney said that he intended to convey the fact that people own corporations, and making corporations pay taxes is just making those people who own the corporation pay more taxes – which get passed on to the consumers of what ever that corporation makes. Corporations are not faceless inanimate objects, they are jobs, incomes, products, services and a host of other things to their employees, owners, customers and vendors. Make an oil company pay more taxes? You are just making gas more expensive. Make a pharmaceuticals corporation pay more taxes? You just made medicine cost more. Pass laws or create regulations to prevent those price increases? You just put those companies out of business. Since a lot of those companies are components in IRAs and pensions, you just screwed a lot of people. Really, where does it stop?
If corporations are ‘not people’ then what are they, exactly? They are property of people. So when you make the corporation pay taxes and then the owners pay additional taxes, you are taxing those people twice. That seems fair, especially since we already have the highest corporate taxes in the developed world… Right.
Then we have the Romney family dog strapped to the roof of the car. He was in a carrier. Dogs ride in carriers inside vehicles. Dogs love to have the breeze flapping their ears and nose and their tongues, too, with as much of their bodies as possible stuffed into however much you dared to roll down the window. Dogs ride in the beds of pickup trucks all the time, too. Based on my experience and observations of my family’s dogs (gasp! profiling!), including one Irish Setter, I am inclined to accept Anne Romney’s claim that the dog liked it. So far, I haven’t seen any evidence that the Romneys actually ate the family dog, like Obama did.
Next we hear that Romney has refused to release more than two years of his records. I believe I covered that more generally in the ‘vetting’ section, but why should Romney release any records when Obama has released virtually none of his own?
Next up is the charge that Romney parks his money in offshore accounts. Lots of rich people do, especially when they can’t make as much investing here, like they want to. Kennedy (yes, I know he’s dead), multiple time Presidential Candidate did. DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz has offshore investments. Should we even talk about tax cheat John Kerry? Nancy Pelosi has offshore money, too, along with many of her co-hypocrites and invested in one of the companies they are trying to bash Romney over with regard to outsourcing jobs. Obama would have them, no doubt, if he’d ever had a high paying private sector job or an inheritance. There are numerous tax cheats in the Obama administration, so he ought to know what he’s talking about – or having his surrogates talk about. It’s all just a distraction to keep you from talking about the jobs crisis.
Now we get to the conspiracy theories. The ‘three prong GOP plan’ to elect Mitt Romney. First of all, is there some reason that the GOP should not be planning to get Romney into the White House? No? So it must be a matter of methods.
Prong one: Sabotage the economy and blame Obama.
The Republicans don’t need to sabotage the economy, Obama is doing fine on his own. Job creation is stagnant – or worse – because of the uncertainty of the cost of doing business that exists. This doesn’t just affect existing businesses, it affects people trying to start businesses, and the most significant factor in job creation is not the size of the business so much as the age of it. The younger the business the more jobs it creates. There is also a high correlation between size and age, which has led to the belief that it is the small companies, and as far as tax policy goes, it works out pretty much the same way. If nobody is starting businesses, they are not creating those jobs. If they aren’t sure they can afford the overhead of even the employees they already have, they aren’t hiring more, and especially with the larger companies, may need to cut staff in order to afford the rest. And no raises. Companies are also spending money – some – on equipment that will replace current or potential new employees just like they did during the last major downturn.
The idea that ‘the federal government is starving the states of funding’ might be arguable if there was a budget, but now, as for the last three years, there isn’t one. The House has passed budgets with some Democrat support but the Senate rejected them, the Obama administration has submitted three budgets which all failed to get any votes at all, and the Democrat controlled Senate has done… nothing. Right now the federal government is just spending willy-nilly and it’s already a catastrophe. And the ‘debt ceiling debacle‘? We got our credit rating downgraded because of our fiscal recklessness. We didn’t have to raise the debt ceiling, but Obama insisted. Blaming that on some GOP conspiracy is just insane.
Mitch McConnell vowing to make Obama a one term President as his most important goal was also presented out of context. Here is the complete quote:
“Well that is true, [making Obama a one-term President is] my single most important political goal along with every active Republican in the country. But that’s in 2012. Our biggest goal for this year is to get this country straightened out, and you can’t get this country straightened out if we don’t do something about spending, about deficit, about debt and get this economy moving again. So, our goal is to have a robust vibrant economy that will benefit all Americans, and that’s why I think this debate that we’re having right now is so important to our country’s future.”
Exactly the opposite of what the video claims.
The claim that people blame Obama more for the struggling economy over ‘Wall Street, Congress or even George W. Bush‘ might be true, but the underlying claim that the crash was caused by Wall Street, Congress or Bush has some serious holes in it. The struggling economy is the direct consequence of the mortgage crisis, and that was engineered by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. Simply, Frank and Dodd created a situation that forced banks to make high risk loans. A large number of these loans went bad – after being bundled and sold overseas in many cases – causing the mortgage bubble created by easy loans to burst. Housing market crashed. Then Dodd and Frank (again) authored some legislation in the Democrat controlled congress that was supposed to help the situation but really just made it a lot worse. Meanwhile, the market crash also wreaked economic havoc in Europe, where many of those bundled toxic assets had gone, and their economic troubles bounced back to us for the double-whammy.
Prong two: Round up a bunch of rich one-percenters to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on misleading ads.
Obama got more wall street donations last election cycle than John McCain and now he’s whining because he pissed off or scared a bunch of them into giving to Romney’s campaign? Whiny crybaby. Obama’s continual reliance on criminals supporting his campaigns should bother you more. It was okay for Obama to expect to spend 1 billion, but now it’s wrong for Romney. And the claim that Romney would be beholden to his big corporate donors is ridiculous, or perhaps it means that Obama is beholden to his big donors, such as SEIU President (former) Andy Stern who visited the White House some 53 times. Then there are some other big donors to Obama, who only got about the same amount of small donations (under $200) as Bush did in 2004. So who is misleading who?
Prong Three: An unprecedented voter suppression campaign.
This one is particularly offensive, considering that the Obama campaign is actively trying to suppress military votes in swing states as part of his reelection strategy, along with a campaign to enable massive voter fraud. Meanwhile, attempts to remove ineligible voters (cartoon characters, pets, felons, non-citizens and dead people, constituencies that vote overwhelmingly Democrat) from the rolls are denounced as vote suppression. Why is this? Because Democrats can’t win some states without massive fraud. Requiring someone to provide an ID in order to vote is also not voter suppression. Some places will provide you with transportation in order for you to get an ID if you don’t already have one and don’t have the means to get to where you can get one. Oh, and it’s free in many places.
On top of that, the hypocrisy of Michelle Obama requiring photo IDs in order to attend her book signings – presumably people who are going to vote for her husband – and Eric Holder, who describes voter IDs as racist, yet required them for his own speech to the NAACP is boundless.
In Pennsylvania, the House Majority Leader, Mike Turzai said “voter ID, which is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania” – not “give” the state to Romney. This statement was also taken out of context, that being that Pennsylvania has had a vote fraud problem which has given the state to the Democrats and would not ‘allow’ a fair election. But this video distorts that context to imply Republican fraud.
And, of course, the race card is played repeatedly. The classic liberal acknowledgement that they don’t actually have the issues on their side.
“Let’s just call it what it is. A racist strategy to stop voters that they think are statistically inclined to vote for Obama. And Mitt Romney is right in lock-step with that plan.”
Finally(!), in their closing comments they said:
“The next President could fill three Supreme Court Justice seats. This election is about a whole lot more than Obama versus Romney. It’s about the soul and direction of our country for the next 50 years.”
They got that much right, but that’s about it.
The anti-Romney protest vote; the Paul zealots and other ‘conservatives’ that are voting third party and even considering voting for Obama ‘to bring on the revolution’:
Even if the Republicans nominated and we elected Ron Paul with a Reagan-like electoral college landslide, he could not make a fraction of the sweeping changes his supporters want him to make. For a party based on the belief that all the evils in our society are based on government excess and intrusion into our everyday lives, Libertarians as a rule show a remarkable inability to see the realities of the modern world. Ron Paul’s foreign policy, the area where he differs from Romney the most, is suicidal. We can’t hide under a rock or wait until we have mushroom clouds over our major cities to defend ourselves, and we cannot simply allow the rest of the world to walk across our borders. To think that we can step back and watch the rest of the world go down in flames while hundreds of millions of refugees flee what ever hell hole they are from – the ones that don’t blame us for abandoning them, rightfully or otherwise – and overwhelm our infrastructure and society is delusional at best. What would actually happen is that China would impose its policies and politics on what ever parts of the world it wanted and leave the rest to the jihadis. World War III would come about, anyway, and we’d be on the crappy end of the stick as a result of having allowed the two powers that most want to destroy us to divide the world between them relatively unopposed. Stupid.
And Libertarians, or whoever the Paul supporters really are, are alienating the rest of us that want to save our country from the Progressives. It’s most likely going to be ‘no zoup for you’ after this election for Libertarians no matter who wins. You can’t have everything you want right away. Our system does not work that way, and it was specifically designed not to work that way so that radicals could not hijack our government easily. If you can’t deal with that then you don’t understand what our founding fathers intended.
No matter how many moral victories you win, no matter how many battles you win, if you lose the war, you still lose. And you get written out of the history books anyway.
Let me see if I have this right…
A family business – gun business – sells firearms to people they *psychically* should have known had lied on their forms, and who were going to walk them to Mexico to be used in the drug war. Their entire livelihood is destroyed with a vengeance, they spend a year in jail and massive amounts of personal property is seized or destroyed. Several of the family members are still in jail even though most of the charges resulted in a ‘not guilty’ verdict, and the charges they were convicted of, pending appeal, are secondary (‘try to keep your wits while the ATF terrorizes you’, making false statements) charges. Okay, throw the book at them for that, even though it appears they did nothing wrong (according to the jury) up until the government fell on them.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department deliberately walked 2000 guns which have resulted in hundreds (300-500, depending on who is doing the math) of murders, some of which were American border agents on American soil. The same Justice Department has withheld documents from Congress, been caught in deliberate false statements to Congress and been held in contempt of Congress for refusing to release the vast majority of documents subpoenaed by Congress.
The Holder Justice Department stages gun walking to attack the Second Amendment (and gets caught at it) and comes down on a legitimate family business like a ton of bricks (with claims that were eventually dismissed by a jury) in order to, again, attack the Second Amendment. On top of that, I smell entrapment.
Somebody should be going to jail, and it isn’t the gun dealers.
Whose money funds hate? Yours does. That is, if you buy gasoline at gas stations that sell gas derived from Middle East oil. The money you spend at those stations takes a very direct route to the Middle East hate factory. And I’m not talking about the standard hate for the West, Israel and the United States. I’m talking about hate of gays. Throughout the Middles East, anywhere Islamic law prevails (officially or unofficially) gays are executed for the crime of being gay. Or they are murdered in the equivalent of honor killings. Or they are simply run down by a mob and tortured to death.
Across the Middle East, hundreds, perhaps thousands, are killed for being gay every year. States like Iran, whose President Ahmadinejad denies that there even are any gay people in Iran, has executed at least 4,000 since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. We don’t buy oil from Iran, but we pay for it with the money we send to China for all the plastic junk they make with their 1 billion slaves. (You’ll be happy to know, though, that China is very tolerant of its gay population as they help with China’s ongoing depopulation program.) The plastic junk is made with petroleum from the Middle East, too. China is the biggest importer of Iranian oil, followed by India, Japan, South Korea and then Turkey (Turkey? Yup.) The somewhat turbulent state of the Iranian oil embargo by the US and the waivers granted to various countries that totally defeat the purpose of it may mean that that list will be different before this article is even posted, but it is unlikely that China’s position at the top of it will change.
Other nations that execute gays that we DO buy oil from include Saudi Arabia. The Saudi regime routinely flogs and imprisons homosexuals and has executed a number as well (death penalty applied to men who are married). In 2005 more than 100 men were sentenced in just one incident for “behaving like women” at an apparent “gay wedding”. In 2011 in Bahrain 127 were arrested for the same thing, and another 149 in Kuwait just this year, although in the last case it is not clear how many of them were gay. And in the UAE. Oman. Lebanon. Qatar. Seven countries altogether have the death penalty for being gay, all in the extended Middle East, all exporters of oil to some degree. The countries of Sudan, Nigeria, Mauritania, The United Arab Emirates and Yemen, in addition to the aforementioned Iran and Saudi Arabia, also execute gays, and in some countries like Egypt, where being gay is not illegal (for now), they are prosecuted under other laws. In Iraq, renegade militias kidnap and kill gays. Even if not always lethal, persecution is rampant throughout the Middle East, from the smallest to the largest country. The list of Middle Eastern countries that do not persecute gays, with penalties including arrest, flogging, prison, torture and death is short. Here it is: Israel. That’s it. Some Middle Eastern countries don’t have laws against being gay, but they punish gays with so-called decency laws. There are plenty of gay people in the Middle East, but come out of the closet on purpose or accidentally at your peril. Only Israel recognizes same-sex marriage, but you can’t get one there, at least not yet.
Strangely by American standards, in much of the Middle East pedophilia, including male on male pedophilia, is widely tolerated as long as the boy involved has not reached sexual maturity. A respected Saudi cleric, Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, issued a fatwa declaring there to be no minimum age for a girl to marry “even if they are in the cradle” as long as they are “capable of bearing the weight of the men.” In Pakistan it is permitted to have sex with a boy, and in Afghanistan you can buy a ‘dancing boy’ or ‘Nancy boy’ as a catamite. NAMBLA must be excited about that. Buying gas from Middle Eastern providers also funds perversion, apparently.
Under some circumstances, though, even the most extreme Muslims can find a reason to tolerate homosexual behavior. Abu al-Dema al-Qasab, a little-known cleric, produced a video in which he announced an “innovative and unprecedented way to execute martyrdom operations: place explosive capsules in your anus. However, to undertake this jihadi approach you must agree to be sodomized for a while to widen your anus so it can hold the explosives.” It seems to me that all those men being arrested and punished for being gay ought really to claim that they are preparing for jihad against the infidels…
Anyway, DEFUND HATE and buy gas that didn’t come from the Middle East. It isn’t that hard to find a station selling North American made gas or at least British made.There is no way to completely extricate Middle Eastern oil from our economy right now, but we can do as much as possible toward that end, and stop giving money to regimes that tolerate, promote and perpetuate hate.